<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>San Jose Real Estate * REALTOR ® * Richard Gonzalez &#187; Sales</title>
	<atom:link href="http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/tag/sales/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com</link>
	<description>Living in the Silicon Valley - News, Views, and Statistics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:10:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Santana Row Sales for May June July 2010 Half of 2009 Levels</title>
		<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/08/03/santana-row-sales-for-may-june-july-2010-half-of-2009-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/08/03/santana-row-sales-for-may-june-july-2010-half-of-2009-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 01:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[June]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santana Row]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rgonzalez.blogs.rwnetwork.com/?p=955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[antana Row area neighborhoods continue to show lower activity after the homebuyer tax credit expired in April. Buyers continue to pay list price on homes sold in these neighborhoods but the activity has been half of 2009 levels. In 2009 there were 114 sales compared to 54 in May - July 2010.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/SVBrokerBlog#p/u/0/ZFnAOJj-01U" target="_blank">Click Player to see video<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-969" title="Screen shot 2010-08-03 at 6.07.59 PM" src="http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/files/2010/08/Screen-shot-2010-08-03-at-6.07.59-PM.png" alt="" width="459" height="243" /></a></p>
<h4>Sales activity lighter than 2009</h4>
<p>Santana Row area neighborhoods continue to show lower activity after the homebuyer tax credit expired in April. Buyers continue to pay list price on homes sold in these neighborhoods but the activity has been half of 2009 levels. In 2009 there were 114 sales compared to 54 in May &#8211; July 2010.</p>
<h4>Conventional is king</h4>
<p>Conventional sales were the predominant financing method used to purchase homes following the same pattern of 2009. FHA continues to be in the least used or accepted financing method by sellers when reviewing offers. Buyers should consider conventional loan products to increase their chances of getting an accepted offer.</p>
<h4>Median rises in 2010</h4>
<p>2010 median sales prices was $610,000 compared to $533,500 in 2010. Buyers also had more negotiating power in 2009 to 97% of original list. 2010 buyers are having to pay slightly more to 102% of original list making it 5% more expensive to buy a home in these neighborhoods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/08/03/santana-row-sales-for-may-june-july-2010-half-of-2009-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>January 2010 Sales Data Santa Clara County</title>
		<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/03/03/january-2010-sales-data-santa-clara-county/</link>
		<comments>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/03/03/january-2010-sales-data-santa-clara-county/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[January]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Clara County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rgonzalez.blogs.rwnetwork.com/?p=831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I uploaded the latest sales data to youtube. Please take a moment to watch this three minute video.

January 2010 sales data for Santa Clara County

http://www.youtube.com/v/ZoaCYVyl8kc]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I uploaded the latest sales data to youtube. Please take a moment to watch this three minute video.</p>
<p>January 2010 sales data for Santa Clara County.</p>

<object	type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
			data="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZoaCYVyl8kc"
			width="425"
			height="350">
	<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ZoaCYVyl8kc" />
	<param name=wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/03/03/january-2010-sales-data-santa-clara-county/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santana Row Sales Q4 2009 vs Q4 2008</title>
		<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/02/11/santana-row-sales-q4-2009-vs-q4-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/02/11/santana-row-sales-q4-2009-vs-q4-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santana Row]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I decided to create an ongoing video update of the Santana Row neighboring area sales and will continue to do so on a quarterly bases to help you track sales activity along with financing terms used in the area. The video can be viewed on my youtube channel and can be viewed by clicking the video below.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to create an ongoing video update of the Santana Row neighboring area sales and will continue to do so on a quarterly bases to help you track sales activity along with financing terms used in the area. The video can be viewed on my <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/SVBrokerBlog" target="_blank">youtube channel</a> and can be viewed by clicking the video below.<br />

<object	type="application/x-shockwave-flash"
			data="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y1L2I9JKLPo"
			width="500"
			height="350">
	<param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Y1L2I9JKLPo" />
	<param name=wmode" value="transparent" />
</object>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2010/02/11/santana-row-sales-q4-2009-vs-q4-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AP Reports a Rise in National Home Sales</title>
		<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/08/12/ap-reports-a-rise-in-national-home-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/08/12/ap-reports-a-rise-in-national-home-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 23:28:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[July]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Associated Press article discusses signs of a possible comeback in home sales. Santa Clara County sales over the last 90 days have been HOT to say the least. Read Article here]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_259" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 453px"><img class="size-full wp-image-259 " src="http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/files/2009/08/7-09_new_home_sales.png" alt="Chart shows sales climbing slowly while inventory declines" width="443" height="310" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Chart shows sales climbing slowly while inventory declines</p></div>
<p>Associated Press article discusses signs of a possible comeback in home sales. Santa Clara County sales over the last 90 days have been HOT to say the least.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/realestatenews/ci_12924681?source=email" target="_blank">Read Article here</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/08/12/ap-reports-a-rise-in-national-home-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lack of Inventory Spurs May Existing Home Sales</title>
		<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/06/24/lack-of-inventory-spur-may-existing-home-sales/</link>
		<comments>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/06/24/lack-of-inventory-spur-may-existing-home-sales/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2009]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[REALTOR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Gonzalez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon valley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the fuel for this fire is coming more from the lack of affordable homes]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="mceTemp">
<dl>
<dt><img class="size-full wp-image-166" src="http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/files/2009/06/480x280_housingrecoverychart.jpg" alt="NAR Housing Recovery Image" width="350" height="204"></dt>
<dd>NAR May 2009 Existing Homes Sales Data</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>NAR report credits interest rates, $8,000 tax credit, affordability, and distressed properties for the increased sales but the fuel for this fire is coming more from the lack of affordable homes causing a flurry of multiple offer activity on the sparse inventory in our area.</p>
<p>Read NAR report: <a title="NAR May 2009 Exsisting Sales Report" href="http://www.realtor.org/press_room/news_releases/2009/06/ehs_continue" target="_blank">REPORT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/06/24/lack-of-inventory-spur-may-existing-home-sales/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Santa Clara County Affordable Home Sales on Fire</title>
		<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/03/22/santa-clara-county-affordable-home-sales-on-fire/</link>
		<comments>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/03/22/santa-clara-county-affordable-home-sales-on-fire/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 03:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Local Market News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Clara County]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Affordable homes in Santa Clara County have once again become a reality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_116" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 310px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-116" src="http://www.siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/20090320_015758_home-sales-2-0320091-300x248.jpg" alt="2009 sales chart" width="300" height="248" /><p class="wp-caption-text">2009 sales chart</p></div>
<p>Those of you looking to time the market should take a look at this article from the Mercury News. Affordable homes in Santa Clara County have once again become a reality. Combined with all time low interest rates and first time home buyer programs we have the makings of a combination buyers should not overlook.</p>
<p><a title="Read Mercury News Article" href="http://www.mercurynews.com/realestatenews/ci_11950479?" target="_blank">Read Mercury New Article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2009/03/22/santa-clara-county-affordable-home-sales-on-fire/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCARY Data brings out the REO MONSTER, Silicon Valley Home Sales for October 2008</title>
		<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2008/12/02/scary-data-brings-out-the-reo-monster-silicon-valley-home-sales-for-october-2008/</link>
		<comments>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2008/12/02/scary-data-brings-out-the-reo-monster-silicon-valley-home-sales-for-october-2008/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 23:42:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[October]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Jose]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[silicon valley]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/?p=62</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Available Homes July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 Median List Price $635,000 $629,000 $645,000 $629,000 Days Unsold Inv. 131.2 125.4 120.8 147.4 Initiated sales Day 40.9 41.2 41.2 33.8 Days/Market Med 83 85 84 90 Days/Market Ave 110 116 117 123 Inventory 5368 5166 4981 4988 Pending Sales June 2008 July 2008 August [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table id="tblMain_0" class="tblGenFixed" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="194"></td>
<td width="120"></td>
<td width="108"></td>
<td width="135"></td>
<td width="87"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s0 style3" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<h3 class="style5">Available Homes</h3>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style6">
<h3>July 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style6">
<h3>August 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style6">
<h3>September 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style6">
<h3>October 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Median List Price</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$635,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$629,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$645,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$629,000</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days Unsold Inv.</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>131.2</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>125.4</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>120.8</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>147.4</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Initiated sales Day</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>40.9</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>41.2</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>41.2</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>33.8</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4 style1">Days/Market Med</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style1">83</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style1">85</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style1">84</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style1">90</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days/Market Ave</td>
<td class="style4">110</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>116</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>117</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>123</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Inventory</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>5368</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>5166</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>4981</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>4988</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style3 s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<h3><span class="style5">Pending Sales<strong><br />
</strong></span></h3>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style8">
<h3>June 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style8">
<h3>July 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style8">
<h3>August 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style8">
<h3>September 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">10% of Pending</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$350,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$330,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$315,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Pending/Median</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$601,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$575,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$529,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">90% of Pending</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$1,375,000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$1,282,500</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$1,192,500</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4 style1">List Price Median</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style1">$574,950</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style1">$559,900</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style1">$529,900</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3 style1">
<div>$475,000</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Sale Price vs List Price Average</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>98.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>98.5%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>98.7%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">% Sale Price Greater List Price</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>32%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>30.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>31.2%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">% Sale Price Less List Price</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>58.9%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>60.5%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>60.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days on Market Median</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>55</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>50</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>61</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>55</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days on Market Average</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>88</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>86</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>97</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>98</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Pending Sales</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>1278</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>1260</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>1286</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>1073</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table id="tblMain_1" class="tblGenFixed" style="height: 322px" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="604">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="182"></td>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="111"></td>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="111"></td>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="116"></td>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="72"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">%Transaction Fell Through(TFT)</td>
<td class="s2 style4">21.7%</td>
<td class="s2 style4">16.9%</td>
<td class="s2 style4">18.7%</td>
<td class="s1">
<div class="style4">TBD</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4 s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<h3><span class="style5">Completed Sales</span></h3>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style10">
<h3>July 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style10">
<h3>August 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style10">
<h3>September 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style10">
<h3>October 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">10% of Pending</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$400,000</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$355,270</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$330,000</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$329,600</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4 style1">Pending/Median</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div class="style1">$719,500</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div class="style1">$648,500</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div class="style1">$600,000</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div class="style1">$550,000</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">90% of Pending</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$1,647,500</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$1,513,500</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$1,331,869</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$1,200,000</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4 style1">List Price Median</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div class="style1">$759,250</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div class="style1">$659,975</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div class="style1">$600,000</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div class="style1">$550,000</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">Sale Price vs List Price Average</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>98.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>98.1%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>98.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div><strong>99%</strong></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">% Sale Price Greater List Price</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>30.5%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>27.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>31.3%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>33.6%</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">% Sale Price Less List Price</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>61.4%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>63.9%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>60.3%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>57.1%</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4" height="21">Days on Market Median</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>36</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>43</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>47</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div><strong>42</strong></div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">Days on Market Average</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>74</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>79</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>88</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>80</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">Closed Sales</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>951</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>934</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>947</div>
</td>
<td class="s3 style4">
<div>TBD</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="style3">Data Courtesy R. Calhoune</span></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>If I told you I could wave a magic wand and <span>teleport</span> you into the past you would think I was crazy but ladies and gentlemen  its true!</p>
<p>As of October 2008 I can now say that we have all been <span>teleported</span> back to November of 1999, that&#8217;s because the affordable areas in  Silicon valley have returned to 1999 levels. I recently previewed homes  in a San Jose neighborhood and was astonished to see the <span>REO</span>(Bank  Owned Properties) activity, to my surprise there were homes selling in  the $210,000 to $250,000 range. 80% of activity in this area was <span>REO</span> sales, California is averaging an 80% <span>REO</span> close ratio. Unbelievable to see these prices but so surreal. Investors  who have been waiting for an opportunity to jump in are now trying to  time the market. I&#8217;d say not to wait much longer because at these  prices its hard to argue the feasibility of having a positive cash flow  property at this point.</p>
<p>The Median home price for Silicon valley  has catapulted us back to April 2000 levels and as such reflects what  we are seeing from the economic downturn. For some this means not only a loss of their 401k net worth but a loss of  equity in their homes, for others its an open invitation to pay  attention and get ready for a bottom that may come as early as Q3 of  2009. Silicon Valley and the bay area in general have always been the  leading indicator for California. Historically speaking we can count on  the Bay Area to rebound first.</p>
<p>The bad news is that we have  had an average of a $50,000 loss in the Median sold price month over  month where the median Sales price went from  $719,500 in July to $550,000  in October.</p>
<p>Median days of unsold inventory for the Silicon valley have <span>creped</span> up to 90 days. We are heading into a historically slow time of the year  and as such the number of new listing drop off until we get past the  Valentines Day Holiday.</p>
<p>With all the negative news the bright  spot is that if you price the property right and can be aggressive then  the averages are in your favor. Sales price vs list price average shows  a 99% average, great news for those who can be aggressive in their list  price. Likewise if you manage to get an offer in the first 42 days you  have an 19.3% chance of it closing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2008/12/02/scary-data-brings-out-the-reo-monster-silicon-valley-home-sales-for-october-2008/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Silicon Valley Home Sales for September 2008, read between the lines.</title>
		<link>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2008/10/09/silicon-valley-home-sales-for-september-2008-read-between-the-lines/</link>
		<comments>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2008/10/09/silicon-valley-home-sales-for-september-2008-read-between-the-lines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:34:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Richard Gonzalez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Brokers Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santa Clara County]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[september]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silicon valll]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Available Homes June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 September 2008 Median List Price $638500 $635000 $629000 $645000 Days Unsold Inv. 125.1 131.2 125.4 120.8 Initiated sales Day 42.7 40.9 41.2 41.2 Days/Market Med 72 83 85 84 Days/Market Ave 80 110 116 117 Inventory 5342 5368 5166 4981 Pending Sales June 2008 July 2008 August [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table id="tblMain_0" class="tblGenFixed" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="rShim style1 style3" style="width: 120px" width="259" bgcolor="#7f9a42"></td>
<td class="rShim style3" style="width: 120px" width="120" bgcolor="#7f9a42"><span class="rShim style1 style3" style="width: 120px"><br />
</span></td>
<td class="rShim style3" style="width: 120px" width="120" bgcolor="#7f9a42"></td>
<td class="rShim style3" style="width: 120px" width="120" bgcolor="#7f9a42"></td>
<td class="rShim style3" style="width: 120px" width="120" bgcolor="#7f9a42"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s0 style3" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<h3 class="style5">Available Homes</h3>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style6">
<h3>June 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style6">
<h3>July 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style6">
<h3>August 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style6">
<h3>September 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Median List Price</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$638500</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$635000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$629000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$645000</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days Unsold Inv.</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>125.1</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>131.2</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>125.4</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>120.8</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Initiated sales Day</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>42.7</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>40.9</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>41.2</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>41.2</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days/Market Med</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>72</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>83</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>85</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>84</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days/Market Ave</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>80</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>110</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>116</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>117</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Inventory</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>5342</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>5368</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>5166</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>4981</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style3 s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<h3><span class="style5">Pending Sales<strong><br />
</strong></span></h3>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style8">
<h3>June 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style8">
<h3>July 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style8">
<h3>August 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style8">
<h3>September 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">10% of Pending</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$390000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$349000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$325000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">50% of Pending/Median</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$675000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$599000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$571700</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">90% of Pending</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$1571500</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$1360000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$1275000</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">List Price Median</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$629500</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$574950</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>$559900</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>$529900</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Sale Price vs List Price Average</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>98.7%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>98.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>98.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">% Sale Price Greater List Price</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>30.7%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>32.2%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>29.8%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">% Sale Price Less List Price</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>61.7%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>58.8%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>62.5%</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div class="style3">
<div>TBD</div>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days on Market Median</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>48</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>55</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>50</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>61</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Days on Market Average</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>83</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>88</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>86</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>97</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4">Pending Sales</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>1281</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>1278</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>1260</div>
</td>
<td class="style4">
<div>1286</div>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table id="tblMain_1" class="tblGenFixed" style="height: 322px" border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="588">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="202"></td>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="134"></td>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="134"></td>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="134"></td>
<td class="rShim style4" style="width: 120px" width="138"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">%Transaction Fell Through(TFT)</td>
<td class="s2 style4">21.2%</td>
<td class="s2 style4">18.5%</td>
<td class="s2 style4">10.8%</td>
<td class="s1">
<div class="style4">TBD</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="style4 s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<h3><span class="style5">Completed Sales</span></h3>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style10">
<h3>June 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style10">
<h3>July 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style10">
<h3>August 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
<td class="s0" bgcolor="#7f9a42">
<div class="style10">
<h3>September 2008</h3>
</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">10% of Pending</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$420000</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$400000</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$355270</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$330000</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">50% of Pending/Median</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$750000</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$719500</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$648500</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$600000</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">90% of Pending</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$1663600</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>1647500</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$1513500</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$1331869</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">List Price Median</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$759000</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$729250</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$659975</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>$600000</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">Sale Price vs List Price Average</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>98.3%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>98.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>98.1%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>98.6%</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">% Sale Price Greater List Price</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>28.1%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>30.5%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>27.6%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>31.1%</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">% Sale Price Less List Price</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>61.3%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>61.4%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>63.9%</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>60.3%</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">Days on Market Median</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>36</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>36</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>43</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>47</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">Days on Market Average</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>74</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>74</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>79</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>88</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="s1 style4">Closed Sales</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>974</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>951</div>
</td>
<td class="s2 style4">
<div>930</div>
</td>
<td class="s3 style4">
<div>TBD</div>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The 2008 Silicon Valley market historically resembles 2001  data.  The next major indicator for our  area will be how the market reacts to the current credit turmoil of October 2008,  Historically speaking  some spikes in our  market place have taken 60 days to correct themselves.</p>
<p>October 2001 was a tipping point and ultimately when the market  then began to heat up.  Obviously there  are major differences from outside influences affecting the market but if we are  trying to get a historical perspective then 2001 is the best year to compare to  a 2008 Santa Clara County real estate market.</p>
<p>1/3 of  all Santa Clara County properties has sold  over asking price, September coming in at 31.3% of the closed transactions.</p>
<p>We have returned  to  the median price point set in Santa Clara County back in May 2000, from 2000 to  the 2006 we saw an increase in the median sale price from the low $400,000 to  $650,000 and now have see those prices drop back to $470,000.</p>
<p>Transactions that are likely to close are the ones that have  been on the market for less than 60 days and properties that have been on the  market for over 90 days are likely to TFT (transaction fell through) at an  average rate of 12%.</p>
<p>Median days on the market for pending sales was 61,  meaning that it took an average of 61 days or less for most people to get into  contract.</p>
<p>Pending category is skewed based on our MLS regulations that  state “short sales must be reported as pending once an offer is accepted”. As a  result we are in contract at record levels, at the highest level in an 8 year  average.</p>
<p>Inventory for January 2008 was over 300 Days on the market  and is now at 121 of inventory. May 2008  saw an upward trend in the market. Setting aside normal declining levels of inventory during the holidays, it appears as  though leading indicators are suggesting a rebound somewhere between February  2009 and April 2009 towards a balanced market environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://Siliconvalleybrokerblog.com/2008/10/09/silicon-valley-home-sales-for-september-2008-read-between-the-lines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

